The White House’s Problem When It Comes to Trying Things By Public Opinion

The White House and President Trump claim that his election shows that the sexual accusations against him were “litigated” by the people and that they found him not guilty or innocent (they are not the same thing).  I even heard a host on MSNBC (Gigi Stone Woods) use the White House argument in a question.  I question whether news hosts should be using the White House argument, but, aside from that, the thing the White House and Trump seem to forget (or ignore or deny) is that he didn’t win the election with the popular vote – he lost the popular vote by millions.  I heard a statistic in the days after the election that only half of eligible voters had voted in the 2016 election.  Given that Trump got about 40% of the vote that means that less than one quarter of the electorate voted for him.  How can that be extrapolated into an exoneration?

A Quinnipiac Poll (Nov. 29 – Dec. 4, +/-2.8 pts.) shows that 70% of people think that Congress should investigate the sexual accusations against Trump.  A letter was sent to Representative Trey Gowdy, Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, requesting an investigation into the accusations.  Gowdy has refused the request, referring the matter instead to Attorney General Jeff Sessions in Trump’s Justice Department.  Gowdy stated that, because no Congressional Committee prosecutes crimes, they shouldn’t have an investigation (https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/13/trump-sex-assault-allegations-house-response-294295).   Yet, how many members of Congress have been investigated for sexual harassment and/or assault by the Ethics Committees?  If such allegations should be referred to the Department of Justice, why haven’t they been both in the past and now?  Not to mention the public funded settlements, a topic for another day, and the fact that the allegations against Trump are mostly, if not entirely, too old to be prosecuted because of the statute of limitations.

Trump has tweeted that, because no collusion with Russia has been found (not true, and investigations are ongoing), his enemies are now trying to bring up accusations by women he has never met (there is photographic evidence of his meeting several of his accusers, and one was a contestant on his reality show The Apprentice – talk about “fake news”).  Every poll result I have seen lately shows that a majority of Americans believe the President did something illegal or unethical when it comes to Russia and the election.

If the President being elected by less than a majority of the voters (and less than one quarter of eligible voters) means that he is innocent of all sexual harassment and assault allegations, then I guess it makes sense (to Trump and his followers, at least) that the majority of the public should be ignored about Russia, investigating the allegations against Trump, the tax bill, etc.

Why this matters to me and should to you to:

The American form of government is supposed to be government “of, by, and for the people.” We shouldn’t legislate by popular vote on everything – some things are just right and wrong. And Civil Rights laws, among others, would never have been enacted without that recognition.  However, an honest investigation of alleged wrong doing shouldn’t be sidelined because of an election outcome or because the statute of limitations has passed (as I’m sure will be cited by the Justice Department about the allegations against Trump).

I’m not asking for a predetermined conclusion and action based on that, but when the majority of Americans believe there has been wrongdoing, there should be an investigation.  This is true of the accusations against Trump on all matters (the perceived attempts to end the Russia investigations in both Houses of Congress is equally worrying).  Shouldn’t the American people be entitled to know that their President isn’t – or is — guilty of sexual harassment and assault, conspiring with the Russian government to use stolen goods (emails) or other Russian influence to win the election, and that he isn’t currently violating the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution?  Trump won the Presidency courtesy of the Electoral College.  The majority of Americans seem to feel differently about him than his supporters and he is not the President of just his supporters.  I think we all deserve honest answers about who the Electoral College put in the Presidency.

I Don’t Trust News That Doesn’t Issue Corrections

Recently there have been a number of corrections in the news about various news stories/headlines/photos that were inaccurate, overblown, or just incorrect/wrong.  This has prompted President Trump to tweet  about “fake news” and call for various journalists to be fired.  I suppose that on one hand this makes sense.  He only seems to really trust Fox News and is friends with a number of hosts there.  However, I stopped watching Fox News a number of years ago, because I never saw a correction or apology when they got a story wrong.  I give immense credit to MSNBC, and one of the reasons I watch them the most, is that I have seen corrections come as soon as before the end of the show in which they got something wrong.  It doesn’t happen often, but MSNBC reporters and commentators correct themselves and do so as quickly as they can.  Because of this, I trust them.

I had decided to write about this today and then saw a really good segment on CNN’s Reliable Sources with Carl Bernstein, investigative journalist and Watergate reporter (with Bob Woodward), and David Frum, former George W. Bush speechwriter and current senior editor at The Atlantic, talking about media corrections and why the media should be trusted (http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2017/12/10/why-did-newsrooms-make-so-many-mistakes-this-week.cnn/video/playlists/reliable-sources-highlights/ – this may not be the entire segment, I couldn’t get the volume to work when I tried to watch it, but the segment is worth watching).  There have been studies that have shown that Fox Viewers are less informed than people who watch no news, and there is a documentary called Outfoxed by Robert Greenwald of Brave New Films that exposed Fox News’ bias and how institutionally enforced it is.  I stopped watching Fox News after repeatedly seeing MSNBC make corrections of information presented by Fox News.  It was especially true when Keith Olbermann was there, but MSNBC personnel sometimes acts as fact checkers of Fox News’ false stories as well as fact checking themselves.

It is especially rich to have a President who is considered to lie more than anyone else to have held the office [The Washington Post calculated it at 5.5 times per 24 hours (although they note is was up to 9 times per day in the 35 days leading up to the article – https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/11/14/president-trump-has-made-1628-false-or-misleading-claims-over-298-days/?utm_term=.e4a1717cd4d5)] as the person claiming that news is false or that journalists should be fired even if they correct and apologize for their mistakes.  David Wiegel tweeted a photo of Trump’s recent Florida appearance that showed a lot of empty seats.  He learned that the picture was from before the event started and immediately deleted the tweet and posted a correction and apology – and yet Trump wants the [from what was said on various shows this weekend] highly respected and fair Washington Post reporter fired.   It’s a shame we can’t call on Trump to be fired for his repeated lying – although I supposed he would claim that, as he has never admitted to a lie or apologized, he obviously hasn’t been lying (like his claim on sexual assault despite the Access Hollywood video and Billy Bush’s public verification of Trump’s words on it in a New York Times op-ed piece this week –   https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/03/opinion/billy-bush-trump-access-hollywood-tape.html).

On Reliable Sources, David Frum said that “mistakes are precisely the reason that people should trust the media”.  I trust news sources that correct their errors.  Reporters are human and humans make mistakes.  How we react to those mistakes are how I judge whether or not to trust a source of news.

Why this matters to me and should to you to:

If Trump had his way, we would only have news sources like Fox News, Breitbart, Drudge, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, etc.  However, much of what comes from many of these “news” sources is much closer to the definition of fake news than what Trump likes to label “fake news,” because real journalists convey real news that he dislikes.

Attacking journalists is one sign of authoritarianism.  The first amendment provides for a free press, and there is a much quoted line from a letter by Thomas Jefferson about how he would prefer newspapers to government.  We need news sources that care about honesty and the truth – especially with a President and White House determined to re-shape reality as they see fit regardless of the truth.  To me, one sign of an honest and truthful press is one that corrects itself when it gets something wrong.  Otherwise the media would just be allowing falsehoods to be believed.  An honest media makes corrections, and we need an honest media, maybe now more than ever.

 

Additional articles of interest on the topic above:

https://www.alternet.org/media/science-fox-news-why-its-viewers-are-most-misinformed

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/donald-trump-lies-liar-effect-brain-214658

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-donald-trump-liar-20171208-story.html